Pay conversations surrounding Wuthering Heights have quickly become part of the film’s broader narrative, reflecting how modern prestige projects balance artistic ambition with the commercial weight of recognizable stars.
With a production budget placing the adaptation among the more substantial literary dramas of recent years, attention has naturally turned toward how that investment was distributed at the top of the cast.
At the center of the discussion stand Jacob Elordi and Margot Robbie, two performers whose global visibility and recent box-office momentum have reshaped expectations around leading-role compensation.
Who earned more, Jacob Elordi or Margot Robbie?
In the financial hierarchy of Wuthering Heights, estimates suggest a significant disparity between its two lead performers. According to Showbiz Galore, Jacob Elordi earned roughly $1 million for his role in the adaptation, aligning with compensation typical for a rising star.
By contrast, Margot Robbie commanded a substantially larger payday, with estimates placing her earnings at approximately $12 million. This figure reflects her long-standing status as both a bankable box-office draw and an acclaimed performer with producing credits.
Such a gap illustrates not only the differing market value attached to each actor’s career trajectory, but also how studios allocate budget to secure well-established names while also investing in emerging talent.
In the context of Wuthering Heights, these compensation figures speak to the film’s blend of star power and artistic casting strategy as it seeks both critical attention and broad audience engagement.