Emma D’Arcy and Olivia Cooke are among the best aspects of “House of the Dragon,” and it’s not just because of the iconic Negroni meme. Their character developments are complex and captivating, largely due to the dynamic bond they share on the show.
As Queen Rhaenyra Targaryen and Queen Alicent Hightower, alongside Matt Smith, they are the flagship faces of the prequel series. With each episode, their relationship becomes increasingly strained, inevitably leading to an unhappy conclusion.
As with any great production, fans have become keen followers of these two performers. A frequently asked question is: Who has the most prominent fortune?
Who is wealthier: Olivia Cooke or Emma D’Arcy?
Although both Emma D’Arcy and Olivia Cooke are playing the lead roles in the most important show of 2024, their backgrounds and career trajectories differ significantly.
Olivia Cooke and Emma D’Arcy in “House of the Dragon”. (Source: IMDb)
Cooke has a longer resume, with 26 movies and TV shows to her credit, whereas D’Arcy has worked on about half that number, totaling 13 productions. Therefore, it’s not surprising that Celebrity Net Worth reports Cooke as being wealthier.
The difference lies in her extensive experience in Hollywood, starring in hits like “Ready Player One,” “The Sound of Metal,” and “Bates Motel,” contributing to her estimated net worth of $2 million.
In contrast, D’Arcy has notably appeared in Prime Video’s “Truth Seekers” and Netflix‘s “Wanderlust,” but has primarily focused on independent films and series, especially shorts. This career path has resulted in an estimated net worth of $1 million.
In summary, Olivia Cooke is richer than Emma D’Arcy, but by a small margin. D’Arcy’s potential for increased earnings will depend on future roles and her alignment with more commercial projects.
